On Wednesday, August 20, 2003, at 05:13  AM, Martin Wirblat wrote:

> Hi Göran,
>
> And if it is not in the image, it is not being used and so it will not
> get tested. That would be a big change in practice.

Whatever gave you that idea? There are several packages on SqueakMap 
that I use *constantly.* I'm sure I'm not the only one. You seem to 
think that if something is not in the image or the update stream it 
doesn't exist. This isn't true.

> The Full-stream would give us a cheap testing-setup by giving as many
> people as possible the chance to play around with Full _before_ the
> release, even if we can't test everything 100%.

I don't see how putting something in the update stream has any impact 
on how well it's tested. People will test things that are important to 
them. If they are important they'll get them from SqueakMap just as 
readily as from the update stream.

If they're not important, they won't get tested. And that's a good 
thing. Let's not waste time testing stuff that nobody uses.

Colin