Yes, that was what I was aiming at.
Nice link.

On Friday, Aug 22, 2003, at 01:29 Europe/Zurich, Richard A. O'Keefe 
wrote:

> Roel Wuyts <wuyts at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
> 	- why it has to be *IN* the method. Like Craig and Michael mentioned,
> 	you could also keep them someplace else, associated with the method.
> 	This is what I did with my type things: I keep them in a dictionary
> 	somewhere, with the CompiledMethod as key (CompiledMethods are around
> 	anyway :-) ). You coud even file such things out as doIts without too
> 	much trouble (to remain lightweight). But again, I think it depends on
> 	what you want to do.
> 	
> I would direct people's attention to Annotea (the link will be found 
> near
> the top of the list on the left of the http://www.w3.org/ home page).
> The point is that
>     "annotation X is *visible* in the code when browsing"
> and
>     "annotation X is *stored* in the code"
> are different and independent propositions.
>
>
Roel Wuyts                                                   Software 
Composition Group
roel.wuyts at iam.unibe.ch                       University of Bern, 
Switzerland
http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~wuyts/
Board Member of the European Smalltalk User Group: www.esug.org