ned at bike-nomad.com
Sat Aug 30 14:23:54 UTC 2003
Jeff Longland wrote:
> Since the topic has come up, I'd be quite interested in the different ways
> Squeak projects can be distributed. What is the opinion of everyone on the
> list for the ideal way to distribute Squeak? I've read about saving changes
> within your project and loading the project using Squeakland's plugin...
> But I'd be interested in knowing more about creating a customized image and
> loading my projects using that image - how? Are there other ways of
> distributing projects?
It depends on the audience. I was just talking with Andreas and Kim Rose about
making some easy way for the Squeakland (plugin) users to have projects that
include a number of other projects.
If you're just trying to make a package that includes code, other resources, and
maybe projects as well, and will be loading it into a regular Squeak image, you
should probably use a SAR. You can now put projects into SARs.
More information about the Squeak-dev