using RegularExpressions for matching (was Re: deficience in
Squeak)
Marcus Denker
marcus at ira.uka.de
Tue Dec 2 08:11:52 UTC 2003
Am 02.12.2003 um 05:02 schrieb smallsqueak:
> BTW, why 'it should be one of the Smalltalk ones' ?
> There are at least 3 of them at the last count ;-)
Is that an argument against picking one?
> Considering that Smalltalk is very productive,
> we may have a dozen of these in no time ;-)
>
Why should there?
> Considering the current rate of evolution of Squeak,
> what's your guesstimate for the sweat needed to test
> and maintain a native Squeak version of regex
> comparable to the current (old) rePlugin ?
> (and don't forget that KCP is sweeping left and
> right, pulling the rug right under your feet ;-)
What are you trying to say with that? "please don't
change anyting". Feel free to declare a fork that does just that.
If you want to make sure that something works in the
future , please write a Test.
Marcus
--
Marcus Denker marcus at ira.uka.de
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|