About Flow in Squeak 3.X [Was Re: Any good ideas for FileNames?]
ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Tue Dec 2 08:35:00 UTC 2003
do you have a plan to get a smooth integration of Flow (meaning slowly
deprecate the current stream)?
If I remember old discussions people were afraid of big bang changes.
However it would be good to
start to thing how flow could become a good replacement of Stream.
What are your current plans? I'm not expert in Streams so does anybody
expertise on Flow and stream comment?
On Mardi, déc 2, 2003, at 09:04 Europe/Zurich, Craig Latta wrote:
> The next version of Flow has a complete URI implementation, and
> filename support is implemented with it. I've been dealing with files
> URLs for several years now, and found that it works well.
> Craig Latta
> craig at netjam.org
> [|] Proceed for Truth!
More information about the Squeak-dev