About Flow in Squeak 3.X
Craig Latta
craig at netjam.org
Tue Dec 2 21:21:04 UTC 2003
Hi Stef--
> Thanks craig for this email. My gut feeling impression is that 4.0 is
> far in the future for me.
Does that mean that if there were a minimal-snapshot-plus modules
system available right now, it would still be a while before you could
use it? Just curious.
> So may be if someone is willing to do that it would be a good idea to
> have Flow sooner.
I actually think it'd be better to obviate any reasons to stay with the
accreted snapshot. :) Making major changes in the old snapshot will
just slow that down.
> I understand that you want to focus on something else, still I'm a
> bit afraid that this will not happen (but may be this is my dark
> face that is talking).
Well, it's already happening from a technical perspective. :) I guess
there's some question as to whether it'll be Squeak or something else,
sure. That's part of the planning I'd like to do now.
thanks again,
-C
--
Craig Latta
http://netjam.org/resume
craig at netjam.org
[|] Proceed for Truth!
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|