"Boris Gaertner" <Boris.Gaertner at gmx.net> wrote:
> Having read http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3534, I think
> that I can take care for the MVC stuff. That is currently not
> a package at SqueakMap, but it is part of Squeak and I use it
> a lot.

Just a comment here - TFNR is about defining the "packages" of the
current base image (staking them out is what I have called it implying
that the immediate goal is not to break them out, because many will no
be easily broken out for quite some time) and finding maintainers +
co-maintainers for them. Breaking them out is the second goal though -
everything will be turned into a package, until we are down the a
"squat" image around 100kb that Craig has been able to produce.

> During the last year, most problems with MVC were
> caused by the fact that we develop mostly in the Morphic
> environment and do not always keep MVC up to date.

True.

> Keeping MVC up to date is possible the most important
> thing that we have to do to maintain that part of Squeak
> and it is something that I can do.

Sounds great. The current "stake out" looks like this:

http://anakin.bluefish.se:8080
login="guest" password=""

As you can see we have staked out "MVC" yet - there are no "in-image
PIs" for it.

It might help us if you could start by posting a list of class
categories/classes that you think "is MVC".
 
> Greetings, Boris

regards, Göran