About test presence
hargettp at mindspring.com
Wed Dec 17 22:43:03 UTC 2003
I agree, BrowseUnit does a nice job of meeting the need.
Stef, if there's something missing from BrowseUnit, perhaps you should
elaborate. Otherwise, I think you'll find some agreement (at least
among a few of us ;) ), and a package that already satisfies the
On Dec 17, 2003, at 3:42 PM, German Morales wrote:
> I fail to see why the BrowseUnit package by Romain Robbes doesn't meet
> your requirements.
> Tests are not only close to the class their tests, but close to the
> they test.
> Also, it creates the tests classes, puts them in a category, and even
> the test after the method it tests when needed, all by itself.
> Perhaps the convention he uses doesn't match *exactly* what you want,
> I'm almost sure that is more or less as the example you've shown.
>> I would like to add in the image the corresponding tests that marcus
>> collected and produce a removal script (which is trivial).
>> Before doing that I would like to know your point of view.
> Put my vote for BrowseUnit, it's just perfect for the task.
> And I looove using it.
> German Morales
More information about the Squeak-dev