[Q] Celeste on Windows 2000
goran.krampe at bluefish.se
goran.krampe at bluefish.se
Thu Dec 18 10:01:47 UTC 2003
Hi!
"Norberto Manzanos" <nmanzanos at caicyt.gov.ar> wrote:
> Hi
> I upgraded my OS from Win98 to 2000 and Celeste could not resolve the =
> pop server name anymore.
Seems strange. Celeste just relies on the same resolving code as the
rest of Squeak.
> I don't know anything about Celeste implementation, I just used it.
> Did anybody know if there is a problem with this SO?
Don't think so. But grabbing the latest Win32 VM is always good. :)
> Do Celeste have some special feature (port, something) that can be =
> filtered by a firewall?
The resolving part is done by NetNameResolver and in a 3.6 image the
code used is something like this:
NetNameResolver addressForName: 'your.machine.com' timeout: 20.
Try it in a workspace. The networking code changed a lot in 3.6 so in my
old 3.2 image (that I use with Celeste) the line goes like:
NetNameResolver addressForName: 'your.machine.com'
And if you look inside (try debug it and step through) you will see that
the DNS lookups are done through primitives in the SocketPlugin. So if
there is a problem I would make sure you have a good VM.
regards, Göran
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|