afunkyobject at yahoo.com
Fri Feb 7 04:50:13 UTC 2003
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 01:09 am, Noury Bouraqadi wrote:
> I totally agree with you Stephane. I faced the same problems when
> making MetaclassTalk. The classbuilder is not clean at all. And in
> many kernel classes, one can find methods with hundreds of lines and
> hardwirings. This make any experiments with core Squeak classes
> Note: My intent is not to blame people who wrote the code, but to
> make Squeak become better...
A good start may be to write a good facade to the classBuilder that could
gradually annex the implementation. If it community accepted it, it could
evolve in just one or two releases to a refactored classBuilder, or any other
part of Squeak, for that matter, that could stand to be factored into an
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
More information about the Squeak-dev