danielv at netvision.net.il
Tue Feb 11 23:36:00 UTC 2003
It's finally happening - we're getting closures... THANK YOU!
A couple of questions relevant to getting it in the image:
1. Do you see us having yet another compiler in the image, coexisting
with the regular one? If not, what do you propose to do?
2. Other than that, and needing new VMs, is there anything else that
needs to change?
Anthony Hannan <ajh18 at cornell.edu> wrote:
> Stephane Ducasse <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
> > So now Tim, Andreas, Dan, Ian, what is the way to go?
> > It would be good not to have the ClosureCompiler as an external
> > changeset but been used in the image.
> I know the closure compiler is a lot to review, but most of it is new
> benign code which can be turned off with the closure compiler
> preference. The only real changes it makes to the image are to
> Exceptions and some changes to Debugger and ContextParts. So you
> may just want to concentrate on reviewing these in 3-ContextEnh-ajh.cs.
> Let me just say that I am confident that the entire closure compiler
> changesets are safe to add to the main image.
More information about the Squeak-dev