[DOCS] Re: Documentation [was: Morphic tutorial]
hannes.hirzel.squeaklist at bluewin.ch
Thu Feb 13 09:24:04 UTC 2003
Stephane Ducasse <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
> May be I should insist and say again that all effort of documentation
> (code based) out of the image are doomed and that Unit tests are the
> only way to go.
See Ralph Johnson's thoughts on documentation
of June 1999 http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/736
We need for example a good explanation about MorphicEvent handling
as outlined by Andreas Raab in another thread.
Having a tutorial about using ProtoMorph for learning about Smalltalk
reflection and learning about the Morph hierarchy is helpful as well.
> Not sexy fancy supercool but the only way to get concrete scenario
> of the system
> in a reproduceable way and in sync with the system because even example
> methods got obsolete.
I agree that we need more unit tests as they provide an automatic
to find out about inconsistences!
More information about the Squeak-dev