semaphores do not access like volatile

David T. Lewis lewis at
Sat Feb 15 13:37:26 UTC 2003

On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 08:27:15PM -0800, Ned Konz wrote:
> On Thursday 13 February 2003 12:18 pm, Lex Spoon wrote:
> > PS -- people who have been here very long, know that I truly think
> > you should get rid of the threads altogether!  You really need tool
> > support to do it better than a single-threaded support. 
> Hey, I made a Process Browser... what more do you want? <g>

It works great, too. You can even click down into the guts of a running
process and see what's going on. I've recently been doing some work that
involves lots of processes and semaphores and other ugliness, and I'd
be lost without the ProcessBrowser.


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list