Future Closure Compiler (was: Two important issues...)
ajh18 at cornell.edu
Sat Feb 15 16:17:08 UTC 2003
Stephane Ducasse <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
> We all know that the RB AST is better than the one in Squeak. I coded the
> night during 2 months a new pretty printer and started to hate the way the
> node do not know their parents and other strange behavior on comments.
> So ***we*** want to use SmaCC.
I have also decided that SmaCC and RB AST would be better that what I am
currently using for the closure compiler. Over the next few weeks I
will refactor the closure compiler to use SmaCC and RB AST.
More information about the Squeak-dev