Future Closure Compiler (was: Two important issues...)
danielv at netvision.net.il
Sat Feb 15 19:40:42 UTC 2003
I think that's a cool idea. Just a question, why do you SmaCC if you're
using the RB AST, why not use the RB Parser?
Anthony Hannan <ajh18 at cornell.edu> wrote:
> Stephane Ducasse <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
> > We all know that the RB AST is better than the one in Squeak. I coded the
> > night during 2 months a new pretty printer and started to hate the way the
> > node do not know their parents and other strange behavior on comments.
> > So ***we*** want to use SmaCC.
> I have also decided that SmaCC and RB AST would be better that what I am
> currently using for the closure compiler. Over the next few weeks I
> will refactor the closure compiler to use SmaCC and RB AST.
More information about the Squeak-dev