Future Closure Compiler (was: Two important issues...)

Daniel Vainsencher danielv at netvision.net.il
Sat Feb 15 19:40:42 UTC 2003

I think that's a cool idea. Just a question, why do you SmaCC if you're
using the RB AST, why not use the RB Parser?


Anthony Hannan <ajh18 at cornell.edu> wrote:
> Stephane Ducasse <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
> > We all know that the RB AST is better than the one in Squeak. I coded the
> > night during 2 months a new pretty printer and started to hate the way the
> > node do not know their parents and other strange behavior on comments.
> > So ***we*** want to use SmaCC.
> I have also decided that SmaCC and RB AST would be better that what I am
> currently using for the closure compiler.  Over the next few weeks I
> will refactor the closure compiler to use SmaCC and RB AST.
> Cheers,
> Anthony

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list