port of prevayler
mail at marco-paga.de
Mon Feb 17 15:52:04 UTC 2003
Question: The Squeak license is that everybody can use the code but only
changes in the base image of squeak should be made public. Right? :-\
But I want people who extend my code to give their enhancement back to
the community. I write code for the community and won't see any money
for that. So i want other people doing it the same way if they profit of
This license reflects most my thoughts about what open source is. Source
must be always opened for everybody who wants to extend his horizon :-) .
btw: There is a big difference between real goods and soource code. I
write something that helps me and after that I can copy this source to
everybody all around the world without loosing something. If somebody
uses my work as a base for further work s/he can do the same. Is it too
Hannes Hirzel wrote:
>Marco Paga <mail at marco-paga.de> wrote:
>>The GPL is the license I like most.
>Why not put the code you are going to write under the Squeak-License and
>MIT and GPL?
>If you are reading this - Andrew Greenberg - is there a problem of
>and putting it under these three licenses at once.
>In the Perl communitiy they often use two licenses at once.
More information about the Squeak-dev