Serge.Stinckwich at info.unicaen.fr
Tue Feb 18 14:50:36 UTC 2003
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 15:03:04 +0100
Stephane Ducasse <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
> Hi jimmie and others
> I think that Squeak deserves a process for managing improvements and
> next actions to be done.
> Is there one Guide responsible of the book keeping?
> I like the idea of serge to propose to use a way to manage request for
> Could a group of people decide on that issue and propose something?
> I would like to see the fonts out of the image (I thought doug did that
> in fact).
> I think that the process should help the harvesting process and also
> the ownership of the code.
> I really feel that we are in this situation where Squeak needs a better
> process for establishing future priority, importance of changes....
If there some interests, i could try to write a first SEP (Squeak Enhancements Proposal) about
what are SEP and how they could be used in the Squeak development process (a kind of bootstrap SEP ;-) in the spirit of the original PEP.
Serge Stinckwich -< ) multiagent.com
Université de Caen>CNRS UMR 6072>GREYC>MAD /~\ squeak.org
http://www.iutc3.unicaen.fr/serge/ (/ | zope.org
Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)] _|_/ debian.org
More information about the Squeak-dev