Licences Question : Squeak-L Art 6.
Alan.Kay at squeakland.org
Tue Feb 18 17:46:07 UTC 2003
I agree that should be changed. I think that current Apple SW does
not have that restriction? Doesn't Apple currently use BSD or some
such as its license policy?
At 6:40 PM +0100 2/18/03, Samir Saidani wrote:
>There is an important restriction to the Squeak-L that I find unfair,
>and that's why I really don't like the Squeak-L.
>You probably see what I mean. Children and people of *all* countries
>have right to play with Squeak.
>6. Export Law Assurances. You may not use or otherwise export or
> reexport the Apple Software except as authorized by United States
> law and the laws of the jurisdiction in which the Apple Software
> was obtained. In particular, but without limitation, the Apple
> Software may not be exported or reexported (i) into (or to a
> national or resident of) any U.S. embargoed country or (ii) to
> anyone on the U.S. Treasury Department's list of Specially
> Designated Nationals or the U.S. Department of Commerce's Table of
> Denial Orders. By using the Apple Software, you represent and
> warrant that you are not located in, under control of, or a
> national or resident of any such country or on any such list.
>goran.hultgren at bluefish.se writes:
>> Squeak-L is the original license of Squeak from Apple. It is very
>> unrestricting and quite simple to understand. IMHO it is a
>> MIT/BSD-flavored license and was mostly intended to protect Apple I
>> guess. You can create software that even includes whole Squeak and
>> redistribute without source (read "sell commercial proprietary
More information about the Squeak-dev