Licences Question : Squeak-L Art 6.
saidani at info.unicaen.fr
Tue Feb 18 17:56:13 UTC 2003
Not redundant, because this clause demands that I follow the export
law of US, AND, the export law of my countries.
Anyway, this clause must be remove, in my opinion.
6. Export Law Assurances. You may not use or otherwise export or
reexport the Apple Software except as authorized by United States
law and the laws of the jurisdiction in which the Apple Software
Ned Konz <ned at bike-nomad.com> writes:
> On Tuesday 18 February 2003 09:40 am, Samir Saidani wrote:
>> There is an important restriction to the Squeak-L that I find
>> unfair, and that's why I really don't like the Squeak-L.
>> You probably see what I mean. Children and people of *all*
>> countries have right to play with Squeak.
> I wonder why Apple bothered to include this clause. After all, if you
> choose to break the export laws yourself, why would they be
> Removing this clause wouldn't change your duty to follow the export
> laws of your country.
> Seems redundant to me.
> Ned Konz
> GPG key ID: BEEA7EFE
PhD in CS / Doctorant en informatique web : http://www.info.unicaen.fr/~saidani
Universite de Caen - Laboratoire GREYC tel : 02-31-56-74-30
Equipe MAD - Campus II - 14032 Caen Cedex fax : 02-31-56-76-30
More information about the Squeak-dev