Licences Question : Squeak-L Art 6.

Samir Saidani saidani at
Tue Feb 18 17:56:13 UTC 2003

Not redundant, because this clause demands that I follow the export
law of US, AND, the export law of my countries.
Anyway, this clause must be remove, in my opinion.

6. Export Law Assurances. You may not use or otherwise export or
   reexport the Apple Software except as authorized by United States
   law and the laws of the jurisdiction in which the Apple Software
   was obtained.

Ned Konz <ned at> writes:

> On Tuesday 18 February 2003 09:40 am, Samir Saidani wrote:
>> Hi,
>> There is an important restriction to the Squeak-L that I find
>> unfair, and that's why I really don't like the Squeak-L.
>> You probably see what I mean. Children and people of *all*
>> countries have right to play with Squeak.
> I wonder why Apple bothered to include this clause. After all, if you 
> choose to break the export laws yourself, why would they be 
> interested?
> Removing this clause wouldn't change your duty to follow the export 
> laws of your country.
> Seems redundant to me.
> -- 
> Ned Konz

Samir SAIDANI				
PhD in CS / Doctorant en informatique 		web :
Universite de Caen - Laboratoire GREYC          tel : 02-31-56-74-30
Equipe MAD - Campus II - 14032 Caen Cedex       fax : 02-31-56-76-30

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list