A squeak3.4 VM will be needed
dway at riskmetrics.com
Sun Jan 19 17:15:10 UTC 2003
On Sunday, January 19, 2003, at 07:48 AM, Andreas Raab wrote:
> The latter is partly why I like naming the VM just "Squeak.exe" for all
> the most experienced Squeakers. It encourages them to think about the
> VM as
> "essentially the same" across all versions (which is true - you can run
> everything back to Squeak 1.1 on the latest VMs) and (for the largest
> not to worry about "uh... now this is Squeak 3.4 VM ... will this work
> if I
> try to start Squeak3.2.image with it???"
True, that sounds reasonable. It's definitely better to bundle the VM
with no version number than to have the wrong version number.
- Doug Way
More information about the Squeak-dev