Proposal: Squeak-E = Squeak x Kernel-E (was: squeak as a
capability system)
Mark S. Miller
markm at caplet.com
Sun Jan 26 18:01:34 UTC 2003
At 09:50 AM 1/26/2003 Sunday, Robert Withers wrote:
>fantastic! I have a couple of questions: Do we need to provide a
>capability interface to plugin code?
I don't know. Please tell me about plugin code.
> Could this help us support function
>callbacks, into the image, so we could use squeak as a shared library to
>another program?
I don't know, probably because I don't yet know about plugins.
> Forget about my authentication ramblings, please.
Ok, I've already forgotten who said this ;).
>PS. Mark, I am adding handling of these three messages to the CapTP
>(id -> class). Does this conflict anywhere?
>
> at: 13 put: CapTPAvailableProtocolsMessage;
> at: 14 put: CapTPSwitchProtocolMessage;
> at: 15 put: CapTPAcknowledgeProtocolMessage;
No conflict, but what's the ack for? I think you only need the first two.
----------------------------------------
Text by me above is hereby placed in the public domain
Cheers,
--MarkM
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|