Doug Way wrote:
> 
> On Sunday, January 19, 2003, at 07:48 AM, Andreas Raab wrote:
> 
>>
>> The latter is partly why I like naming the VM just "Squeak.exe" for 
>> all but
>> the most experienced Squeakers. It encourages them to think about the 
>> VM as
>> "essentially the same" across all versions (which is true - you can run
>> everything back to Squeak 1.1 on the latest VMs) and (for the largest 
>> part)
>> not to worry about "uh... now this is Squeak 3.4 VM ... will this work 
>> if I
>> try to start Squeak3.2.image with it???"
> 
> 
> True, that sounds reasonable.  It's definitely better to bundle the VM 
> with no version number than to have the wrong version number.

Indeed.  And you don't usually run "java-x.y.z"; you run "java".  And if 
you want to know the version you run "java --version".

Julian
-- 
julian at beta4.com
Beta4 Productions (http://www.beta4.com)