goran.hultgren at bluefish.se wrote:
 >
 >[...]
> 
> My advice is to simply duallicense under SqueakL and MIT. That would
> keep everyone happy except for Richard Stallman, but GPL isn't a
> practical option in Squeak land anyway. MIT is AFAIK mixable with
> anything since it practially doesn't contain any restrictions at all.
> 
What is MIT?

Does it make sens to have two different licences for the same uses of 
the same software? I mean licences can be conflicting. So how to avoid 
conflicts and how to know when one is "active" or not?

Noury
-- 
------------------------------------------
Dr. Noury Bouraqadi
Ecole des Mines de Douai - Dept. G.I.P
http://csl.ensm-douai.fr/noury
------------------------------------------