KCP 64-90 - comments, questions and approvals

Daniel Vainsencher danielv at netvision.net.il
Tue Jul 1 12:22:27 UTC 2003


Yup, that's the way to go.

Daniel

Doug Way <dway at riskmetrics.com> wrote:
> 
> On Thursday, June 26, 2003, at 10:01 AM, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
> 
> > Doug, KCP doesn't show up in BFAV yet, hence this heads up. This
> > approves almost all the outstanding KCP stuff.
> >
> > To business - I really like the way the new deprecation system works
> > out. People deprecating all sorts of protocols should really be using
> > this. Of course for every deprecation we do, eventually, we'll have to
> > remove the deprecated code - maybe we should do this at the beginning 
> > of
> > each alpha?
> 
> That sounds right.  We can simply check for all senders of the 
> deprecatedExplanation/deprecated:explanation: and then delete those 
> methods.
> 
> > ...
> > One place where I think things should be done differently (we talked
> > about this before -) 64.
> >
> > Everything else, that is, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 76, 78, 83, 84, 85, 87,
> > 88, 90 - approved.
> 
> So is this a reasonable stopping point?  If so, I can go ahead and 
> incorporate these. (excluding 64 for now)
> 
> Here's the list if anyone else is curious (see 
> http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3257 )
> 
> KCP-0090-SpaceTally.cs
> KCP-0088-FixChangeSet.cs
> KCP-0087-MovefullScreenModeToDisplayScreen.cs
> For the changes 85 and 84. You will prompted to know if SystemChanges 
> shouldmarked as undeclared. Then one deprecated method will be 
> executed: this is normal because the changeset is changing the exact 
> method that is loading the changesets. So just proceed.
> KCP-0085-MoveToChangeSet.cs
> KCP-0084-ChangeSetCurrentFixed.cs
> KCP-0083-NewBeepENG.cs
> KCP-0078-fixDeprecationMechanism.cs
> KCP-0076-ValidateSubclassFormatFix.cs
> KCP-0071-mvDefaultSelectorForMethod.cs
> KCP-0070-FixSmalltalkReferenceInBrowser.cs
> KCP-0069-FixChangeSorter.cs
> KCP-0068-Imports.cs
> KCP-0067-beep.cs
> KCP-0064-PictReaderClass.cs
> 
> - Doug Way



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list