[UPDATES] All clear to update, plus one new update
Stephane Ducasse
ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Thu Jul 3 19:32:15 UTC 2003
Hi doug and other
I have a question for the future KCP items. In the previous changeset I
did not fix the call made by SqueakMap
because I worked with a 3.5 image. After that I moved to a 3.6alpha and
following now all the udpates to avoid to have
problems.
Now my question should I fix the calls made by SqueakMap even if
SqueakMap is a package?
I have no problem to do that. But I thought that SqueakMap was not in
the image or I was simply confused.
Stef
On Wednesday, July 2, 2003, at 10:57 PM, Doug Way wrote:
>
> The problems with the update stream should now be fixed. So, if you
> have a 3.6a-5294 image or earlier, you can go ahead and update it
> safely. (If you have a 5305 image, you should probably throw it in
> the trash and go back to an earlier image and update it.)
>
> I decided to replace the 5303 and 5305 updates with Ned's changesets,
> because they clear up both the Undeclared popup and the deprecation
> notifier. So, you shouldn't see any notifiers or popups now while
> updating from 5294 to 5306. And yes, I added Ned's & Brent's
> additional fixes in an extra update 5306.
>
> - Doug Way
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
> 5306MoreChangeSetFixes-nk -- Ned Konz -- 2 July 2003
> v2: adds a couple of methods that Brent Vukmer noticed, cleans up some
> more callers of Smalltalk newChanges:.
> This fixes a few problems and omissions in updates
> 5303KCP85MoveToChangeSet and KCP-0089-FixChangeSet, notably fixing
> some SqueakMap-related methods to refer to ChangeSet current instead
> of Smalltalk changes.
>
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|