> 
> We need, in the long run, some more elaborate tool for this: 
> It would be nice if I could sort all the pending fixes for 
> the sub-project. So the harvesters would see a todo-list, and 
> the package-maintainers could get a list with all fixes/enh 
> for their package. 
> 

Yes, I agree.  I would like to have a different "channel" for each
package on SqueakMap. I'm still thinking about how to implement the
back-end for that.

>From the application side, I have a feeling that this functionality
would fit best in the StarBrowser.  The Star Browser already has a
really nice SqueakMap UI; it seems natural to add per-package update
stream and bug-fixes-archive services there.