[BUG][FIX][TEST] Process termination

Andreas Raab andreas.raab at gmx.de
Sun Jul 27 19:09:41 UTC 2003


Ah, sorry didn't see it and just happened to bother me like hell. Never mind
;-)

Cheers,
  - Andreas

> -----Original Message-----
> From: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org 
> [mailto:squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On 
> Behalf Of Anthony Hannan
> Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 8:38 PM
> To: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> Subject: Re: [BUG][FIX][TEST] Process termination
> 
> 
> I made the same fix 4 days ago under the subject "DebuggerUnwindBug",
> and Marcus approved it under BFAV the next day.  Sorry it was not
> commented noticeably enough in the email.
> 
> Does this fix the problem Stephen Pair reported under ""[BUG] Socket
> accept handling" earlier today.  Stephen?
> 
> Cheers,
> Anthony
> 
> 
> "Andreas Raab" <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
> > Run the attached tests to see the effect.
> > 
> > "Change Set:		ProcessTerminateFix
> > Date:			27 July 2003
> > Author:			Andreas Raab
> > 
> > When a process is terminated 'from the outside' (e.g., 
> being sent the
> > #terminate message without being the active process) it 
> needs to suspend
> > itself *before* running any unwind blocks in order to 
> prevent spurious
> > errors if the process is being released from the list it is 
> currently
> > waiting on."
> 



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list