[BUG][FIX][TEST] Process termination
Andreas Raab
andreas.raab at gmx.de
Sun Jul 27 19:09:41 UTC 2003
Ah, sorry didn't see it and just happened to bother me like hell. Never mind
;-)
Cheers,
- Andreas
> -----Original Message-----
> From: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> [mailto:squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On
> Behalf Of Anthony Hannan
> Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 8:38 PM
> To: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> Subject: Re: [BUG][FIX][TEST] Process termination
>
>
> I made the same fix 4 days ago under the subject "DebuggerUnwindBug",
> and Marcus approved it under BFAV the next day. Sorry it was not
> commented noticeably enough in the email.
>
> Does this fix the problem Stephen Pair reported under ""[BUG] Socket
> accept handling" earlier today. Stephen?
>
> Cheers,
> Anthony
>
>
> "Andreas Raab" <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
> > Run the attached tests to see the effect.
> >
> > "Change Set: ProcessTerminateFix
> > Date: 27 July 2003
> > Author: Andreas Raab
> >
> > When a process is terminated 'from the outside' (e.g.,
> being sent the
> > #terminate message without being the active process) it
> needs to suspend
> > itself *before* running any unwind blocks in order to
> prevent spurious
> > errors if the process is being released from the list it is
> currently
> > waiting on."
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|