On Sunday, July 27, 2003, at 05:22  PM, Andreas Raab wrote:

Tim wrote:

>> Better yet I only loaded MC yesterday but
>> already an update seems to require a newer version. Sheesh, I don't
>> have much chance of getting this right it seems.

Andreas concurred:

> My frustrations exactly. I spent the whole day trying to figure out 
> how to
> use those mechanisms to no good effect. It seems that the deprecation 
> of DVS
> shows already and Monticello not being present and not being stable 
> leaves
> us with no reliable packaging mechanism short of change sets. Back to 
> the
> roots...

What exactly is the problem with Monticello? I don't know of any issues 
with it.

Colin