3.6 "full" packages
Daniel Vainsencher
danielv at netvision.net.il
Mon Jul 28 17:01:08 UTC 2003
Don't worry Goran, as soon as deps work, this stuff will go away pretty
quick - nobody wants to maintain these installation hacks a moment
longer than needed :-)
Daniel
goran.krampe at bluefish.se wrote:
> Regarding silently installing packages: NO. Please NO. I know that
> people are sick of me talking about the upcoming SM but we should NOT
> install prereqs silently. And we should NOT have such logic in
> loadscripts. But I know - as long as SM1.1 isn't here people are allowed
> to cheat. Just don't get used to it.
>
> And finally: What should I do? It sounds like I should add installation
> support in SM of course. If someone has an SMInstaller whipped up I am
> happy to receive it. Otherwise I can possibly fudge it myself.
>
> Monticello is still listed as Beta so I don't think we shiuld include it
> in Squeak 3.6 "Basic". People will just need to install it first.
>
> regards, Göran
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|