On Thursday, June 5, 2003, at 02:01 PM, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:

> It's the reviewing/harvesting process at work. "with no data" is
> imprecise - the [cd][er][et][sm] is Marcus (a reviewer) telling any
> potential harvesters (like me), that this fix is well documented,
> reviewed by himself (and implicitly, contains good code), tested by
> himself (and implicitly, it works), and quite small (so it'd be easy for
> me to have a look too).
>
> Then a harvester can reply with the tag [approved], to which Doug will
> eventually reply with [update - NNNN], and that's how things get into
> the update stream.
>
> What all of this activity means is that people's stuff is getting looked
> at, and as a result, Squeak is getting better.
>

At last! Eureka!!! So, the message is *not* in the message, it's in the 
subject line!

Oh to be a Freemason

Perhaps I will check ou the BFA sometime soon