Hmm, I'm a bit confused.  I just tried using multiple
semicolon-delimited patterns in an updated 3.6a image without this
changeset, and it worked fine.  I checked if the code had made it
it in a different change set, but it doesn't appear that it has.

<shrug>

Joshua

On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 10:38:25PM -0700, schwa at cc.gatech.edu wrote:
> Small change that works great.  I augmented a method comment a bit, and
> used the brace notation instead of String>>with:with:with:.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> < Brought to you by the BugFixArchiveViewer and CommentNotePad >

>