"Lex Spoon" <lex at cc.gatech.edu> wrote:
> Alain Fischer <mailinglist.fischer at bluewin.ch> wrote:
> > What is your feeling about including  the ANSI Compatibility package
> > in the 3.6 or perhaps 3.7 base image. It is as less possible invasive  
> > for the system.
[SNIP of good summary]
> Compatibility is nice, there is no conceptual cost to it, and the risks
> are small.  We should put it in and be done with it.
> 
> Lex

As it says on SM there are only 11 modified methods. Seems quite non
intrusive.
I haven't reviewed it but it sure sounds like it could easily go in.

regards, Göran