Daniel Vainsencher <danielv at netvision.net.il> wrote:
> There is a problem with all these schemes that use code as signs, which
> is that as far as automated analysis goes, this makes SystemDictionary
> dependent on all those classes, and preserves the mess we're trying to
> get rid of in the first place.

Eh, right. Extremely good point of course. :-)

regards, Göran