Steve Dekorte wrote:

> >
> >           http://www.cs.inf.ethz.ch/~muller/PieterMuller.pdf
> 
> They seem to be using the term "active object" for what languages like 
> Act1 and ACBL/1 call "actor". Is "active object" the proper term? I'm 
> not faulting them for their choice of terms. I'd just like to know the 
> proper term to use myself.
> 

    You might want to read page 11 (Chapter 2, Active Object Concepts), 
    then visit:

                http://www.lists.inf.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/oberon

    Cheers,

    PhiHo.