[KCP] SystemDictionary cleaning: Comments and design

Richard A. O'Keefe ok at cs.otago.ac.nz
Mon Jun 16 01:08:09 UTC 2003


Daniel Vainsencher <danielv at netvision.net.il> wrote:
	There is a problem with all these schemes that use code as
	signs, which is that as far as automated analysis goes, this
	makes SystemDictionary dependent on all those classes, and
	preserves the mess we're trying to get rid of in the first place.

Why do you think I proposed putting this information in a *comment*?

Yes, "sources with it" is slow, but looking these things up is not going
to be a high frequency operation, so it doesn't matter.



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list