[ANN] Testserver ImageTester Fwd: [Test-Runner Results]
Squeak3.6alpha latest update: #5269
marcus at ira.uka.de
Wed Jun 18 08:04:50 UTC 2003
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 06:51:46PM +0200, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
> And Marcus -
> * Even in the failures we see here, we see a huge difference in
> importance between tests. ClassBuilder and AtomMorph do not have the
> same importance. What criteria should apply? how "Core" the tested
> functionality is, whether we are talking about enhanced documentation or
> newly fubared functionality (the first would obviously not stop a
> release..). Any ideas on how to order the test suites to reflect this?
Should be possible somehow... by building the TestSuits by hand, and
having the testserver run those...
What I was allready planning to do was to set up some conventions for
letting the tests print some comment of the status. e.g. lots of
the bugs allready have FIXes that just havn't been harvested yet.
Marcus Denker marcus at ira.uka.de -- Squeak! http://squeak.de
More information about the Squeak-dev