FramerateMorph reports a lot slower in 3.5 & 3.6 than it does in3.4

Sun Jun 22 21:14:20 UTC 2003

On Sun, 22 Jun 2003 13:54:29 -0700 Glenn Ehrlich <glenn.ehrlich.lists at cox.net> wrote:
>However, FrameRateMorph reports very different results:
>
>image FrameRateMorph
>3.6   20 mSecs (50 frames/sec)
>3.5   20 mSecs (50 frames/sec)
>3.4   2 mSecs (500 frames/sec)
>
>As you can see, vastly different.

Glenn,

Look at the performance section of preferences and see if "higherPerformance" is set in your 3.4 image and not in the others.

Cheers,
Bob