On Thursday 26 June 2003 12:53 am, goran.krampe at bluefish.se wrote:

> Ah, right. Just tested it. This is in fact due to the network
> rewrite - the SM code isn't prepared for an Error. :-)

Yeah. So we need to rip out the raising of the error and instead do 
one of:
* return nil as before
* let the error propagate (which means that you will get the "try 
again/give up" confirmation if we don't change the handling)

-- 
Ned Konz
http://bike-nomad.com
GPG key ID: BEEA7EFE