When somebody will want it :). However, I think that we want to 
minimize to develop on two fronts.
If you want to participate to develop SmallWiki I can open you an 
account on our store repository.

I think that to avoid too much problem we should wait until we have a 
really stable version on VW.
What I can tell you is that Smallwiki is really good. Still a bit rough.

Stef

On Saturday, June 28, 2003, at 12:08 PM, <diegogomezdeck at consultar.com> 
wrote:

> Hi Stef,
>
> Do you have any idea of When SmallWiki will be ported to Squeak?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Diego
>
>> hi
>>
>> We thought a lot already about the feature we would like in a wiki and
>> we are following this discussion with big interest.
>>
>> However, we decided not to extend/pacth Swiki because we got into
>> trouble. We started to develop a Wiki SmallWiki (now in Visualworks 
>> but
>>  everything in made to port it into Squeak).
>> SmallWiki will be in public beta before the end of the summer, we plan
>> to integrate the "stuff" of James Robertson just for fun.
>>
>> SmallWiki has a good OO design and is made to be extended. We are
>> working slowly on getting an architecture that allows other to define
>> plugging but this will be soon there. SmallWiki have a good security
>> model, multiple renderers that are simply developed.
>>
>> If you want to know more....http://scgwiki.iam.unibe.ch:8080/SCG/520
>>
>> If you have idea for SmallWiki please edit the wish list/or if you 
>> want
>>  to participate please do.
>>
>> Soon we will start to migrate all our internal Swiki to SmallWiki.
>>
>> Stef
>
>
>
>