Against package removal before packages work correctly
danielv at netvision.net.il
Sun Jun 29 14:23:42 UTC 2003
A. Welcome to alpha land.
B. If you want to reinstate the Full image, load the Full 3.6 package
from SM, and then carry on as usual.
C. You're right. Unless dependencies work before 3.6 is released, we may
have to release only the Full image in this version too.
Nevertheless, removing the packages allows them to be maintained outside
the update stream, which is faster.
Anthony Hannan <ajh18 at cornell.edu> wrote:
> I just tried to install SmaCC-Development from SqueakMap into a fresh
> 3.6 image and I got an error because SmaCC tries to add a method to
> TestCase which no longer exists in 3.6.
> Why are we removing packages before the package infrastructure is
> completely implemented (including dependents)? It doesn't make sense.
More information about the Squeak-dev