Mythical small kernel images?

Alejandro F. Reimondo aleReimondo at smalltalking.net
Wed Mar 5 17:47:19 UTC 2003


Hi,

> Do you have any architecture documents I could see? Working through code
> is good, but some understanding of your _intent_ would be very helpful.
> For example, I don't really see what you intend with the .bigbang files
> and all the includes of other bigbang and chachara files.

Please take the chachara and bigBang files as simple literal examples
 to know the minimum set of objects can conform a Squeak image.
They are simply chunk formated source files.

Ale.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tim Rowledge" <tim at sumeru.stanford.edu>
To: <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: Mythical small kernel images?


> Hi Ale.,
> I've managed to make an image, though it seems to have a mutual
> recursion somewhere between print and printf:, but I'll work that out
> soon.
> 
> Do you have any architecture documents I could see? Working through code
> is good, but some understanding of your _intent_ would be very helpful.
> For example, I don't really see what you intend with the .bigbang files
> and all the includes of other bigbang and chachara files.
> 
> Oh, and is it ok with you if I mention to Jon Hylands the stuff you've
> done for remote debugging? It could certainly help him, and would mean
> I could concentrate on the core parts.
> 
> tim
> 
> -- 
> Tim Rowledge, tim at sumeru.stanford.edu, http://sumeru.stanford.edu/tim
> If you think nobody cares about you, try missing a couple of payments.
> 
> 



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list