I'd suggest the following - 
* Make sure they integrate with the SqF Swiki stuff on the similar
subjects, and also the other minnow pages on how to contribute (how to
submit fixes and so forth).
* Mostly separate the issues of stewardship and factoring the image.
They are indeed tightly linked, but it doesn't have to be the same
person doing both.
* We have a lot of important information there - separate the wheat from
the chaff clearly. I agree with Goran that huge pages with simply
extracted information from soon-historic images are not very important.
Remember the old images are always available for the budding
archeologist - leave only the pages we really want people to read.

Daniel

Brent Vukmer <bvukmer at blackboard.com> wrote:
> I have re-titled, and lightly edited these three pages ( mostly, gotten rid of "Core" language ):
> 
> "Factoring Squeak 3.4+ into Packages" ( http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3084 )
> "3.4 Packages" ( http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3085 )
> "Stewards for Packages" ( http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3088 )
> 
> The only long-term purpose for the "3.4 Packages" page is a historical record to compare too, as we factor the image going forward...
> 
> Further comments/edits/puns are welcome!
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: goran.hultgren at bluefish.se [mailto:goran.hultgren at bluefish.se]
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 4:22 PM
> To: Discussing the Squeak Foundation
> Cc: Squeak-Dev (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [Squeakfoundation]Stewards and Squeak Packages
> 
> 
> Hi!
> 
> "Brent Vukmer" <bvukmer at blackboard.com> wrote:
> > Please review the following Swiki pages:
> > "Core Packages" ( http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3084 )
> > "3.4 Core Packages" ( http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3085 )
> > "Stewards for Core Packages" ( http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3088 )
> 
> I looked them over and wrote two comments. Well, one on "Core packages"
> and one somewhere else... Anyway, in short:
> 
> 1. I disagree with the definition of "core package". Can be debated of
> course.
> 2. I am a bit uneasy of these pages with long lists of
> classes/categories. Are they really going to be kept updated? Consider
> me skeptic.
> 3. I like the "Stewards" stuff. And Squeak estate is also a nice pun
> with some meaning. But we may take it a bit easy on the signing up part.
> 
> I mean - we shouldn't just let "anyone" sign up as a Steward for a core
> package without due discussion and some form of agreement on these
> lists. I know we don't have a formal process or anything like that - but
> still. you can't just grab something and call yourself a Steward.
> 
> If there is anything we Guides should take responsibility for then it is
> to steer this process of dishing out Stewardships.
> 
> > I think that the "Stewards for Core Packages" page is a decent beginning for a Stewards sign-up sheet.
> 
> Yes, but I took the liberty of typing in a few remarks according to what
> I wrote above. Ok?
> 
> regards, Göran