Daniel, good points; I agree on all three and will do what I can to update the 
Swiki pages appropriately.  Thanks for reviewing.

Docs team -- could somebody else take a tour through the SqF Swiki for pages on similar subjects, and link/re-write the Squeak Swiki appropriately?

Thanks,
Brent

-----Original Message-----
From:	Daniel Vainsencher [mailto:danielv at netvision.net.il]
Sent:	Thu 3/6/2003 6:05 PM
To:	The general-purpose Squeak developers list
Cc:	
Subject:	RE: [Squeakfoundation]Stewards and Squeak Packages
I'd suggest the following - 
* Make sure they integrate with the SqF Swiki stuff on the similar
subjects, and also the other minnow pages on how to contribute (how to
submit fixes and so forth).
* Mostly separate the issues of stewardship and factoring the image.
They are indeed tightly linked, but it doesn't have to be the same
person doing both.
* We have a lot of important information there - separate the wheat from
the chaff clearly. I agree with Goran that huge pages with simply
extracted information from soon-historic images are not very important.
Remember the old images are always available for the budding
archeologist - leave only the pages we really want people to read.

Daniel

Brent Vukmer <bvukmer at blackboard.com> wrote:
> I have re-titled, and lightly edited these three pages ( mostly, gotten rid of "Core" language ):
> 
> "Factoring Squeak 3.4+ into Packages" ( http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3084 )
> "3.4 Packages" ( http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3085 )
> "Stewards for Packages" ( http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3088 )
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 3391 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20030306/baeb12a2/attachment.bin