It appears that the [et], [er] comment tags have to be within the
comment parentheses (since a post by Tim with the comment tags
preceding the parentheses didn't make it through).  The documentation
on the swiki doesn't reflect this.

Is this be the desired behavior?  It seems reasonable to me; I'll make
the appropriate change to the swiki documentation.

This all very exciting!  Thanks to everyone involved in harvesting,
refactoring, packaging, etc.

Joshua


On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 01:31:01AM -0500, Doug Way wrote:
> 
> On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 12:35 PM, Jesse Welton wrote:
> 
> > Brent Vukmer wrote:
> >>
> >> Cool feature!  One minor thing: the tags *read* a little weird.
> >> "et, er - it's beautiful" sounds like someone stuttering :)
> >> Also the tags look kind of like 'Who is Who' nicknames.  Could we
> >> put fix tags in some kind of brackets?
> >
> >> [Fix] Adjust the background to a paler shade of gray
> >>   Jane Doe (2/3/4)
> >>   Joe Shmoe (5/3/4) (<et><er> - it's beautiful)
> >
> > I'll second that.  This way reads alot more clearly for me, as well.
> 
> I see that Brent (or somebody) ended up using square brackets in the 
> swiki page docs, which I probably like the most.  Like this:
> 
>    [FIX] Adjust the background to a paler shade of gray
>      Jane Doe (2/3/03)
>      Joe Shmoe (5/3/03) ([et][er] - it's beautiful)
> 
> http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/398
> 
> But we don't have to be too rigid about this, as long as they're not 
> parentheses, which apparently messes up the sqfixes parser. :-)
> 
> - Doug Way
>