I really like the suggestion of a [su] tag for posts that include SUnit tests.

If the submitted changeset passes relevant existing SUnit tests, I think that [et] ("Externally Tested") tag is fine.


-----Original Message-----
From:	Joshua 'Schwa' Gargus [mailto:schwa at cc.gatech.edu]
Sent:	Sat 3/8/2003 10:00 AM
To:	The general-purpose Squeak developers list
Cc:	
Subject:	Re: Process, harvesting, getting your favorite things in the image
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 12:13:39PM +0300, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
 

What about an [su] tag if SUnit tests are included or if the changeset
passes relevant existing SUnit tests?

> 
> Of course, the SLint tool is on SM, just install the RefactoringBrowser,
> and type LintDialog open (hmm, should add it to the open menu). Check it
> out!

Will do.

Joshua


> 
> Daniel
> 
> Joshua 'Schwa' Gargus <schwa at cc.gatech.edu> wrote:
> > It appears that the [et], [er] comment tags have to be within the
> > comment parentheses (since a post by Tim with the comment tags
> > preceding the parentheses didn't make it through).  The documentation
> > on the swiki doesn't reflect this.
> > 
> > Is this be the desired behavior?  It seems reasonable to me; I'll make
> > the appropriate change to the swiki documentation.
> > 
> > This all very exciting!  Thanks to everyone involved in harvesting,
> > refactoring, packaging, etc.
> > 
> > Joshua
> > 
> > 
> > On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 01:31:01AM -0500, Doug Way wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 12:35 PM, Jesse Welton wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Brent Vukmer wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Cool feature!  One minor thing: the tags *read* a little weird.
> > > >> "et, er - it's beautiful" sounds like someone stuttering :)
> > > >> Also the tags look kind of like 'Who is Who' nicknames.  Could we
> > > >> put fix tags in some kind of brackets?
> > > >
> > > >> [Fix] Adjust the background to a paler shade of gray
> > > >>   Jane Doe (2/3/4)
> > > >>   Joe Shmoe (5/3/4) (<et><er> - it's beautiful)
> > > >
> > > > I'll second that.  This way reads alot more clearly for me, as well.
> > > 
> > > I see that Brent (or somebody) ended up using square brackets in the 
> > > swiki page docs, which I probably like the most.  Like this:
> > > 
> > >    [FIX] Adjust the background to a paler shade of gray
> > >      Jane Doe (2/3/03)
> > >      Joe Shmoe (5/3/03) ([et][er] - it's beautiful)
> > > 
> > > http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/398
> > > 
> > > But we don't have to be too rigid about this, as long as they're not 
> > > parentheses, which apparently messes up the sqfixes parser. :-)
> > > 
> > > - Doug Way
> > >




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 4031 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20030308/b3cb7a04/attachment.bin