The swiki is updated with the [su] tag and its usage.

Joshua

On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 08:01:23AM +0300, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
> Joshua 'Schwa' Gargus <schwa at cc.gatech.edu> wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 12:13:39PM +0300, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
> > > - Raise our standards. You'll note that one of the tags that we really
> > > want people to use is the SLint tool. Yes, it's a new tool, but it often
> > > brings to one attention things like "now that you mention it, maybe a
> > > shorter method would be better". So please, use the tags. Even for a
> > > very short update such as Diegos MethodReference fix, it drew my
> > > attention to it.
> > 
> > The first was clear.  Reading the second makes sense, but I'm not sure
> > that I explicitly realized it before your email.  
> Yes, I often find that people don't telepathically understand what I
> mean from the snippets that actually say. Haven't found where to file a
> bug report about that... ;-)
> 
> > What about an [su] tag if SUnit tests are included or if the changeset
> > passes relevant existing SUnit tests?
> [su] sounds like a good idea, I'd like to sharpen it's meaning to "is
> covered by tests, and passes them", whether the tests are included or
> not. The details part should describe the tests if new, or point at the
> source for an existing set, so that further reviewers can decide for
> themselves whether they really cover the code properly.
> 
> Daniel