goran.hultgren at bluefish.se wrote:

> AFAIK your package isn't yet considered as being in
> the "official Squeak base" so you are not a
> "Steward".

Awww, and I just ordered myself a "Sexy Squeak
Steward" T-shirt...


Daniel Vainsencher wrote:

> Wonderful, you don't need to write such a script,
> just help me out with the one that I have made.

I was hoping someone would say that. :)

For what it's worth, I just tried your change sets,
and ended up with exactly the same results as Brent
Vukmer - CelesteComposition is trying to define four
instance variables that are already defined in
MailComposition. It looks to me like a simple
oversight - after removing those four variables from
CelesteComposition, the code filed in cleanly, and I
can still send messages from Celeste.


> Do consider that SM has categories for Alpha
> software. I think it's important to make packages
> visible, and not conflate this issue with
> package maturity.
>
> Consider the case where someone starts writing
> a similar framework, because they don't see yours
> on SM, where they could instead help you mature
> TW faster.

Yeah. What you said. :)


Adam Spitz


______________________________________________________________________ 
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca