IN THUNDEROUS TONES: ... AND WHAT ABOUT THE SYNTAX OF SQUEAK? WHAT 
ABOUT THE OBJECT NATURE OF SQUEAK?

.....

At 3:37 PM -0500 3/13/03, Jarvis, Robert P. (Contingent) wrote:
>  > -----Original Message-----
>>  From: Jimmie Houchin [mailto:jhouchin at texoma.net]
>>
>>  Marcus Denker wrote:
>>  >
>>  > Then I have to ask: Why should I put *any* more work into
>>  Squeak? Seriously.
>>  >
>>  >         Marcus
>>
>>  Good question.
>>  This why I think this is an important issue.
>
>IANAL
>
>If the Squeak community wants a truly "free" Squeak then the Squeak
>community is going to have to rewrite Squeak to eliminate any and all code
>and objects inherited from Xerox, Apple, and Disney.  I think this is the
>"path of least risk".  Until this is done in a documentable fashion Squeak
>will always have Xerox, Apple, and Disney looming over it like
>thunderclouds.
>
>Bob Jarvis
>Compuware @ Timken
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>This message and any attachments are intended for the
>individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended
>recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this
>communication to others; also please notify the sender by
>replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
>
>The Timken Company
>**********************************************************************


--