monticello (was Re: [UPDATES] 2 fixes for 3.5alpha)
Julian Fitzell
julian at beta4.com
Sat Mar 15 22:27:47 UTC 2003
goran.hultgren at bluefish.se wrote:
> Stephane Ducasse <ducasse at asterix.unibe.ch> wrote:
>
>>Hi
>>
>>I have the impression that we need a repository in which multiple
>>people can post. SM is good to publish
>>something you do but not a bunch of people are doing.
>>
>>For the kernel tests we will be responsible of them.
>
>
> Perhaps Monticello has come a bit further now, Avi or anyone else?
> http://map2.squeakfoundation.org/sm/packagebyname/monticello
>
> regards, Göran
>
It hasn't really come any further in a while. Not because it couldn't
be taken further but because CVS works fine for pretty much everything
Avi and I do so we haven't been that motivated. I still think it has a
lot of potential so if there's some interest, and particularly if others
want to help out, we may be able to find some more time to pull it out
and dust it off.
As I recall, it was left off in a state where we were having a lot of
disccusion about different types of merge patterns
(client-side/server-side, branches/named changesets, etc) and trying to
figure out which way we wanted to go with it. The problem was almost
that what is there so far could be used as a base for any of the methods
and we just weren't sure where to go with it next.
Julian
--
julian at beta4.com
Beta4 Productions (http://www.beta4.com)
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|