goran.hultgren at bluefish.se wrote:
[snip]
> The argument for this triad is good. It is a simple "layered" approach
> so people understand it - strict dependencies downwards according to the
> gif I posted.

[snip]

> NOTE: SM categories can change name. So please, by all means, continue
> fighting it out - it doesn't stop us from introducing these categories
> now. :-)
> NOTE2: A package release can only be in *one layer* at a time.

Why not just name the layers L1, L2 and L3 in SM1.1 until there are
better names?

-- Hannes